Hands Off Hartlebury Common

Contact the author of the petition

This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition Hands Off Hartlebury Common.

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:30


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:37


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:43


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:46


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:49


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:49


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:53


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 21:55


Steve McCarron

#559 Re:

2011-07-06 22:24

#555: -

Sorry, no court costs.

Steve McCarron

#560 reply to council employees

2011-07-06 22:26

Today was a great day. The halfwits at county hall still could not prove ownership. A confused looking Tom Pollock tried to keep up with events but will be remembered by us all for pulling faces when our legal counsel spoke.
The judge, if you can call him that, did not understand basic conveyancing and commons law.
Todays result is exactly what we anticipated and expected. The campaign is going ahead as planned.

To all council employees, can you be a bit more imaginative when leaving comments. No matter how hard you try, you all sound the same?

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 22:27


Steve McCarron

#562 Re: signatures

2011-07-06 22:27

#552: -

I know but 700 is!

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 22:29


Steve McCarron

#564 tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:29

Today was a great day. The halfwits at county hall still could not prove ownership. A confused looking Tom Pollock tried to keep up with events but will be remembered by us all for pulling faces when our legal counsel spoke.
The judge, if you can call him that, did not understand basic conveyancing and commons law.
Todays result is exactly what we anticipated and expected. The campaign is going ahead as planned.

To all council employees, can you be a bit more imaginative when leaving comments. No matter how hard you try, you all sound the same?

Guest

#565 Re: Re: Re: signatures

2011-07-06 22:31

#563: - Re: Re: signatures

A lot more than the supposed full and proper public enquiry

Steve McCarron

#566 Re:

2011-07-06 22:32

#554: Carol -

Just fine

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 22:33



Guest

#568 Re: Re: Re: Re:

2011-07-06 22:33

#558: - Re: Re: Re:

Why don't you be specific, GUEST

Mrs Christine Lovett

#569 Re: tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:35

#564: Steve McCarron - tom bollock 

 

What was the result?
Steve McCarron

#570 Re: Re: tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:36

#569: Mrs Christine Lovett - Re: tom bollock

We won

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-07-06 22:38


Mrs CL

#572 Re: Re: Re: tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:38

#570: Steve McCarron - Re: Re: tom bollock 

 

So what happens next? Did you have to pay for the fence?

Guest

#573 Re: Re: Re: Re: tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:39

#572: Mrs CL - Re: Re: Re: tom bollock

no

Mrs CL

#574 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:41

#573: - Re: Re: Re: Re: tom bollock 

 

So what next?
Steve McCarron
Guest

#575 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: tom bollock

2011-07-06 22:47

#574: Mrs CL - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: tom bollock

We will let you know

 

Steve