Petitions.nz
Browse Petitions Search Contact the petition author Contact Us Languages Manage your signatures Confirm your signature with a code Log in
Start a Petition

Report a petition

Fir Tree School Site, Opposition to Planning Applic DC14/56717

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

Which passage is false? You can click several sentences in the petition text, and tell us for each what is true. This is optional.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Fir Tree School Site, Opposition to Planning Applic DC14/56717

Points from The Quirk Review - Making Assets Work. An asset not used in the public interest can lead to local resentment and risk community cohesion. It can have a negative impact on other stakeholders and the wider community.

We the undersigned object to planning application DC/14/56717 submitted by Persimmon Homes detailing the use of the whole site for the building of 66 dwellings and 12 apartments. We request that the football pitch and green open space be retained for use by the community with associated small centre/changing rooms and the preservation of the Millenium Wood that was planted by the then kids of the school. We suggest that the remainder of the land be looked at to build 2 bedroom bungalows and 1 bed apartments. The estate can not cope with any larger builds, the local schools and GP's are already struggling to accomodate the overpopulation of the estase.

NOTES:

There have been 2 previous petitions regarding this site and many matters and issues that were raised have yet to receive responses from Sandwell MBC. These include a full and detailed response to Agenda Item 5 of the Asset Management and Land Disposal Cabinet Committee meeting held on 19 June 2013. There were also additional questions submitted that remain unanswered.

There is a development -The Oxford Road that 2 bedroom bungalows. Can this scheme or similar be replicated.

There is a precedent for keeping a football pitch and building a changing room that being on the Churchfield site.

There is a precedent for a Persimmon Home application being thrown out in order to save a green space. 26th July 2013 Birmingham City Council planners threw out an application for 129 homes on a former primary school's (Martineau Centre) playing fields. A Labour Councillor stated that the application should fail as their own policy stated that where playing pitches are in short supply, development should only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. Another Labour Council suggested that the developer draw up a proposa which includes a smaller number of houses mixed with a community or commercial sports facility.

We ask that we are heard and treated in a similar manner please.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Fir Tree School Site, Opposition to Planning Applic DC14/56717

Points from The Quirk Review - Making Assets Work. An asset not used in the public interest can lead to local resentment and risk community cohesion. It can have a negative impact on other stakeholders and the wider community.

We the undersigned object to planning application DC/14/56717 submitted by Persimmon Homes detailing the use of the whole site for the building of 66 dwellings and 12 apartments. We request that the football pitch and green open space be retained for use by the community with associated small centre/changing rooms and the preservation of the Millenium Wood that was planted by the then kids of the school. We suggest that the remainder of the land be looked at to build 2 bedroom bungalows and 1 bed apartments. The estate can not cope with any larger builds, the local schools and GP's are already struggling to accomodate the overpopulation of the estase.

NOTES:

There have been 2 previous petitions regarding this site and many matters and issues that were raised have yet to receive responses from Sandwell MBC. These include a full and detailed response to Agenda Item 5 of the Asset Management and Land Disposal Cabinet Committee meeting held on 19 June 2013. There were also additional questions submitted that remain unanswered.

There is a development -The Oxford Road that 2 bedroom bungalows. Can this scheme or similar be replicated.

There is a precedent for keeping a football pitch and building a changing room that being on the Churchfield site.

There is a precedent for a Persimmon Home application being thrown out in order to save a green space. 26th July 2013 Birmingham City Council planners threw out an application for 129 homes on a former primary school's (Martineau Centre) playing fields. A Labour Councillor stated that the application should fail as their own policy stated that where playing pitches are in short supply, development should only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. Another Labour Council suggested that the developer draw up a proposa which includes a smaller number of houses mixed with a community or commercial sports facility.

We ask that we are heard and treated in a similar manner please.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Fir Tree School Site, Opposition to Planning Applic DC14/56717

Points from The Quirk Review - Making Assets Work. An asset not used in the public interest can lead to local resentment and risk community cohesion. It can have a negative impact on other stakeholders and the wider community.

We the undersigned object to planning application DC/14/56717 submitted by Persimmon Homes detailing the use of the whole site for the building of 66 dwellings and 12 apartments. We request that the football pitch and green open space be retained for use by the community with associated small centre/changing rooms and the preservation of the Millenium Wood that was planted by the then kids of the school. We suggest that the remainder of the land be looked at to build 2 bedroom bungalows and 1 bed apartments. The estate can not cope with any larger builds, the local schools and GP's are already struggling to accomodate the overpopulation of the estase.

NOTES:

There have been 2 previous petitions regarding this site and many matters and issues that were raised have yet to receive responses from Sandwell MBC. These include a full and detailed response to Agenda Item 5 of the Asset Management and Land Disposal Cabinet Committee meeting held on 19 June 2013. There were also additional questions submitted that remain unanswered.

There is a development -The Oxford Road that 2 bedroom bungalows. Can this scheme or similar be replicated.

There is a precedent for keeping a football pitch and building a changing room that being on the Churchfield site.

There is a precedent for a Persimmon Home application being thrown out in order to save a green space. 26th July 2013 Birmingham City Council planners threw out an application for 129 homes on a former primary school's (Martineau Centre) playing fields. A Labour Councillor stated that the application should fail as their own policy stated that where playing pitches are in short supply, development should only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. Another Labour Council suggested that the developer draw up a proposa which includes a smaller number of houses mixed with a community or commercial sports facility.

We ask that we are heard and treated in a similar manner please.

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.