"Brown used his police resources to identify and contact the juvenile. A sexual relationship ensued and lasted through the summer months of 2010. The juvenile came forward because he felt there were other potential juvenile victims who were being targeted. Farmington Police Dept. conducted an investigation case #13-56742 and even though a warrant was written, charges were never filed."

The only thing in this statement that is true is "Farmington Police Dept. conducted and investigation case #13-56742." The rest of the information is either inaccurate or taken from some other report. No where in the investigation was it proven that Sgt Brown use police resources to track down the individual in question. No where in the report is it stated that a warrant was written and yet no charges were filed. It does state that due to the boys age, the DA did not file charges due to the state law saying 16 is the age of consent.

At no time does the report state that the boy lied about his age. As to why the boy came forward later, he stated he was "afraid" that Sgt. Brown and his boyfriend at the time may have other victims. This again was not true. Neither Sgt. Brown nor Mr. Lucero knew the actual age of the boy at the time until MR LUCERO himself checked as stated in the police report.

From what I have been told by several people there are a lot of problems with the Bloomfield Police Department. The chief himself has stated that he doesn't want "faggots" working for the department. The Lieutenant himself has been involved in domestic violence, he uses a department issued patrol car to go to his second job at Autozone. From what I have learned through research is that the police department has purchased handguns and issued them to the City Manager. City Councilors have been carrying weapons purchased by the city.

So before judging what is going on with Sgt Brown's personal life someone should be looking in their own backyard before pointing fingers.

#119: Retired Police Officer -

Yesssssss!!!!!!! You are exactly right!!